Guyanese vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,232,010 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 7.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,059,408 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 2.8%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Guyanese	Immigrants from Latvia
Minimum	1.0%	5.8%
Maximum	50.0%	100.0%
Range	49.0%	94.2%
Mean	11.2%	21.0%
Median	9.5%	12.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.7%	10.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.9%	19.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	9.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.9%	25.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.8%	24.7%

Demographics Similar to Guyanese and Immigrants from Latvia by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Immigrants from Sweden (7.6%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Cambodian (7.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Eritrea (7.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and Immigrants from Norway (7.7%, a difference of 0.96%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Potawatomi (7.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (7.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Creek (7.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from China (7.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and British West Indian (7.8%, a difference of 0.75%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 7.6%
Guyanese	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 7.6%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Norway	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 7.7%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 7.7%
Kiowa	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 7.7%
Ugandans	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 7.7%
Colville	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 7.7%
Pueblo	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Denmark	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Spain	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 7.8%
British West Indians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 7.8%
Creek	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Chile	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 7.8%
Potawatomi	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Latvia	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 7.8%