Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,575,119 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,059,408 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 1.2%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Uruguayan	Immigrants from Latvia
Minimum	3.6%	5.8%
Maximum	19.4%	100.0%
Range	15.8%	94.2%
Mean	8.8%	21.0%
Median	7.9%	12.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.9%	10.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.4%	19.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.5%	9.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.8%	25.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.6%	24.7%

Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Immigrants from Latvia by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Albania (7.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Morocco (7.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Indonesian (7.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (7.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (7.9%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Potawatomi (7.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (7.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Moroccan (7.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Creek (7.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and Bahamian (7.8%, a difference of 0.30%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
British West Indians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 7.8%
Creek	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Chile	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 7.8%
Potawatomi	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Latvia	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 7.8%
Moroccans	100.0 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 7.8%
Bahamians	100.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Egypt	100.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	99.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 7.9%
Filipinos	99.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 7.9%
Ottawa	99.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 7.9%
Iranians	99.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 7.9%
Indonesians	99.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Morocco	99.9 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 7.9%
Uruguayans	99.9 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Albania	99.9 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	99.9 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	99.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 7.9%
Argentineans	99.9 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 7.9%