White/Caucasian vs Scotch-Irish Unemployment
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Scotch-Irish
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Scotch-Irish
4.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Scotch-Irish Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,869,025 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.863 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 545,559,279 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.555 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%.

Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | White/Caucasian | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 15.8% | 58.0% |
| Range | 11.9% | 56.8% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 11.3% |
| Median | 5.8% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 13.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Scotch-Irish by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), French Canadian (4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Scotland (4.9%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Bolivia (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Tongan (4.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Czechoslovakian (4.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Bolivian (4.8%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Lithuanians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| French | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| French Canadians | 99.3 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.2 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |