Zimbabwean vs Lithuanian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Lithuanian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Lithuanians
13.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
14.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
22.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Lithuanian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,821,414 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,241,212 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.831 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 0.62%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 3.2% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 49.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 46.2% | 93.3% |
Mean | 14.7% | 28.6% |
Median | 12.2% | 18.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.9% | 33.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 20.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 25.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 24.8% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Lithuanians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Japanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Italian (13.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Austrian (13.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Senegalese (13.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Swedish (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Norway (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Slovene (13.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Laos (13.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Grenada (13.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Laos | 23.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.0% |
Lithuanians | 22.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Norway | 21.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.0% |
Slovenes | 21.6 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 21.4 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.0% |
Basques | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 20.4 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.0% |
Estonians | 20.3 /100 | #204 | Fair 13.0% |
Poles | 19.3 /100 | #205 | Poor 13.0% |
Northern Europeans | 18.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 13.0% |
Sudanese | 17.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 13.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 17.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 13.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 17.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 13.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 16.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 13.1% |
Swedes | 16.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 13.1% |
Senegalese | 16.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 13.1% |
Italians | 15.9 /100 | #213 | Poor 13.1% |
Zimbabweans | 14.9 /100 | #214 | Poor 13.1% |
Japanese | 14.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 13.1% |
Austrians | 13.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 13.1% |