West Indian vs Immigrants from Liberia Female Poverty
COMPARE
West Indian
Immigrants from Liberia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
West Indians
Immigrants from Liberia
16.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
281st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
West Indian vs Immigrants from Liberia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,850,168 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,246,592 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 2.8%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | West Indian | Immigrants from Liberia |
Minimum | 7.8% | 3.5% |
Maximum | 35.3% | 45.5% |
Range | 27.4% | 42.0% |
Mean | 15.7% | 16.9% |
Median | 14.6% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.1% | 20.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to West Indians and Immigrants from Liberia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Bahamas (16.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from West Indies (16.1%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.55%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |