Ute vs Norwegian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Ute
Norwegian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Ute
Norwegians
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Norwegian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,601,527 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300 and weighted average of 21.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 523,024,216 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 66.1%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Norwegian |
Minimum | 5.4% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 87.0% | 75.6% |
Range | 81.7% | 72.8% |
Mean | 32.4% | 14.2% |
Median | 25.1% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.6% | 15.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.4% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.7% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 9.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Creek (21.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Dutch West Indian (21.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.5%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.1% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Korea (13.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Bulgarian (13.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Lithuania (12.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Cypriot (13.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Japan (13.0%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.1% |