Bhutanese vs Norwegian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Norwegian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Bhutanese
Norwegians
12.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Norwegian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,361,741 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 523,024,216 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 3.5%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 45.2% | 75.6% |
| Range | 43.3% | 72.8% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 14.2% |
| Median | 9.8% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Norwegians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ireland (12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and Burmese (12.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Korea (13.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Bulgarian (13.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Lithuania (12.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Cypriot (13.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Japan (13.0%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.1% |