Maltese vs Norwegian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Maltese
Norwegian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Maltese
Norwegians
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Norwegian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,710,734 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 523,024,216 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 1.4%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Maltese | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 0.98% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 54.9% | 75.6% |
| Range | 53.9% | 72.8% |
| Mean | 14.4% | 14.2% |
| Median | 12.6% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.1% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Norwegians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Indian (Asian) (13.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Okinawan (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Latvian (13.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Eastern European (13.2%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Korea (13.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Bulgarian (13.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Lithuania (12.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Cypriot (13.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Japan (13.0%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |