Bolivian vs Norwegian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Bolivian
Norwegian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Bolivians
Norwegians
13.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Norwegian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,043,367 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 523,024,216 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 2.1%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 0.74% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 43.1% | 75.6% |
| Range | 42.4% | 72.8% |
| Mean | 11.7% | 14.2% |
| Median | 10.8% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Norwegians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from China (13.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Eastern European (13.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Latvian (13.2%, a difference of 0.50%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and Indian (Asian) (13.1%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Korea (13.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Bulgarian (13.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Lithuania (12.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Cypriot (13.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Japan (13.0%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |