Uruguayan vs Subsaharan African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Subsaharan African
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Uruguayans
Sub-Saharan Africans
16.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
64.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Subsaharan African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,695,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.485 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 496,899,151 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 20.1%, a difference of 24.3%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 3.0% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 56.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 53.8% | 98.3% |
Mean | 22.0% | 28.3% |
Median | 17.1% | 21.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.0% | 33.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.1% | 14.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 19.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 19.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Yugoslavian (16.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (16.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Venezuela (16.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (20.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Comanche (20.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Belizean (20.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Barbadian (20.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Bangladeshi (20.0%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |