Tlingit-Haida vs American Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
American
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Americans
8.3%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
78.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs American Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,762,722 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.186 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 575,593,251 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 27.3%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | American |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 5.0% |
| Maximum | 17.8% | 89.4% |
| Range | 16.4% | 84.4% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 16.5% |
| Median | 7.5% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 17.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 11.7% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Chinese (8.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Norwegian (8.7%, a difference of 4.0%), Swedish (8.7%, a difference of 4.7%), Immigrants from India (8.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and Danish (8.8%, a difference of 5.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Poles | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Americans by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Immigrants from Cameroon (10.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Greece (10.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Alaskan Athabascan (10.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Spanish (10.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Immigrants | Europe | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 10.5% |
| Osage | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 80.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Iraqis | 80.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Laotians | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 10.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 79.0 /100 | #147 | Good 10.6% |
| Americans | 78.1 /100 | #148 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 78.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 77.3 /100 | #150 | Good 10.6% |
| Spanish | 76.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 76.5 /100 | #152 | Good 10.6% |
| Fijians | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 74.9 /100 | #154 | Good 10.7% |
| Chickasaw | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 10.7% |