Swiss vs Luxembourger Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Swiss
Luxembourger
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Swiss
Luxembourgers
9.2%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Luxembourger Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,823,104 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.516 and weighted average of 9.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,471,416 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 0.43%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swiss | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 3.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 68.4% | 11.5% |
Range | 65.1% | 10.2% |
Mean | 12.6% | 7.3% |
Median | 8.3% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Luxembourgers by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Thai (9.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Slovak (9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Scottish (9.2%, a difference of 0.32%), European (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Slovene (9.3%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Slovene (9.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Welsh (9.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Thai (9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Irish (9.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Poles | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Thais | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Irish | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Italians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |