Slovene vs Polish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Slovene
Polish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Slovenes
Poles
12.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovene vs Polish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,242,953 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,323,396 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slovene | Polish |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 33.1% | 87.1% |
| Range | 31.9% | 85.5% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 13.1% |
| Median | 10.3% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Slovenes and Poles by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Danish (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Cypriot (11.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Singapore (11.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Iran (11.8%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |