Slovene vs Immigrants from Asia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Slovene
Immigrants from Asia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Slovenes
Immigrants from Asia
12.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovene vs Immigrants from Asia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,242,953 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,172,468 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 1.7%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slovene | Immigrants from Asia |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 33.1% | 66.7% |
Range | 31.9% | 63.7% |
Mean | 11.2% | 12.5% |
Median | 10.3% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 12.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Slovenes and Immigrants from Asia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Croatia (12.0%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.10%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Indian (Asian) (12.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |