Slavic vs Finnish Male Poverty
COMPARE
Slavic
Finnish
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Slavs
Finns
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Finnish Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,742,219 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,315,970 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 0.68%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | Finnish |
Minimum | 0.066% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 41.3% | 47.7% |
Range | 41.2% | 43.9% |
Mean | 11.9% | 12.3% |
Median | 9.3% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 14.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Finns by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Egypt (10.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |