Serbian vs Sri Lankan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Serbian
Sri Lankan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Serbians
Sri Lankans
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Sri Lankan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,517,669 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,135,013 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.168 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 0.46%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Serbian | Sri Lankan |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 43.9% |
Range | 48.4% | 42.6% |
Mean | 14.5% | 16.8% |
Median | 13.4% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 18.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Serbians and Sri Lankans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Croatia (15.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ukraine (15.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chilean (15.1%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Belgian (15.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Dutch (15.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Croatia (15.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |