Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,776,258 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,223,465 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.308 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.99%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Ethiopian	Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Minimum	2.1%	1.9%
Maximum	19.5%	55.6%
Range	17.4%	53.6%
Mean	10.8%	14.3%
Median	11.5%	10.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.7%	7.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.0%	15.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.3%	8.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.2%	12.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.1%	12.5%

Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Spanish (11.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (11.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Hungary (11.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Pennsylvania German (11.8%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Ukrainian (11.7%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Iraqi (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Icelander (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.7%, a difference of 0.26%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Burmese	88.7 /100 \| #111	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	88.4 /100 \| #112	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	87.0 /100 \| #113	Excellent 11.7%
Ukrainians	86.9 /100 \| #114	Excellent 11.7%
New Zealanders	86.3 /100 \| #115	Excellent 11.7%
Iraqis	86.3 /100 \| #116	Excellent 11.7%
Icelanders	85.7 /100 \| #117	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	85.5 /100 \| #118	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Uganda	84.8 /100 \| #119	Excellent 11.8%
Immigrants \| Nepal	84.5 /100 \| #120	Excellent 11.8%
Malaysians	84.1 /100 \| #121	Excellent 11.8%
Pakistanis	84.0 /100 \| #122	Excellent 11.8%
Immigrants \| Italy	84.0 /100 \| #123	Excellent 11.8%
Fijians	83.8 /100 \| #124	Excellent 11.8%
Sudanese	83.6 /100 \| #125	Excellent 11.8%
Pennsylvania Germans	83.4 /100 \| #126	Excellent 11.8%
Immigrants \| Denmark	82.6 /100 \| #127	Excellent 11.8%
Immigrants \| Hungary	81.7 /100 \| #128	Excellent 11.8%
Ethiopians	80.7 /100 \| #129	Excellent 11.8%
Spanish	80.5 /100 \| #130	Excellent 11.8%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	79.6 /100 \| #131	Good 11.9%