Polish vs Pima Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Polish
Pima
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Poles
Pima
14.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Pima Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,911,563 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.467 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,516,106 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 29.0%, a difference of 106.8%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.49% | 13.1% |
| Maximum | 64.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 63.8% | 86.9% |
| Mean | 16.3% | 39.2% |
| Median | 13.1% | 34.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 47.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 24.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 23.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 22.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Poles by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Israel (14.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Tsimshian (14.1%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Belgium (14.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Estonians | 99.2 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Italians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Poles | 98.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Tsimshian | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Yuman (28.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Navajo (30.2%, a difference of 4.2%), Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and Hopi (27.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.5% |