Soviet Union vs Pima Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Pima
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Soviet Union
Pima
14.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Pima Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,397,160 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.081 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,516,106 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 29.0%, a difference of 100.3%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Pima |
Minimum | 0.56% | 13.1% |
Maximum | 22.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 21.8% | 86.9% |
Mean | 10.9% | 39.2% |
Median | 10.3% | 34.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 47.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 24.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 23.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 22.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Latvia (14.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Egyptian (14.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (14.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Argentina (14.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Taiwanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Swiss | 97.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 97.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.1 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Soviet Union | 97.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 97.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Taiwanese | 97.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Germans | 96.9 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Austrians | 96.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Italy | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Yuman (28.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Navajo (30.2%, a difference of 4.2%), Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and Hopi (27.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.7% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.5% |