Houma vs Czech Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Houma
Czech
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Houma
Czechs
26.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Czech Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,674,950 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.841 and weighted average of 26.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,396,955 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 85.4%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma | Czech |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 97.3% | 36.6% |
| Range | 93.2% | 35.5% |
| Mean | 30.8% | 14.9% |
| Median | 22.8% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.2% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.1% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.5% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.1% | 6.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Houma by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Crow (26.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Hopi (25.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Cheyenne (25.8%, a difference of 1.5%), Sioux (25.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and Yup'ik (24.7%, a difference of 6.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Moldova (14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Greek (14.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Scotland (14.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and Italian (14.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Koreans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |