Nonimmigrants vs Moroccan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
Moroccan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Nonimmigrants
Moroccans
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
3.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nonimmigrants vs Moroccan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,225,965 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.353 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,724,575 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 1.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nonimmigrants | Moroccan |
| Minimum | 6.7% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 24.7% | 51.5% |
| Range | 18.0% | 47.1% |
| Mean | 15.1% | 16.6% |
| Median | 14.4% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants and Moroccans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Africa (14.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |