Nonimmigrants vs Spaniard Female Poverty
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
Spaniard
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Nonimmigrants
Spaniards
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
3.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nonimmigrants vs Spaniard Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,225,965 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.353 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 443,063,734 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spaniards and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 13.9%, a difference of 4.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nonimmigrants | Spaniard |
| Minimum | 6.7% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 24.7% | 68.3% |
| Range | 18.0% | 65.9% |
| Mean | 15.1% | 20.4% |
| Median | 14.4% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 22.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 13.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 12.9% |
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants and Spaniards by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Africa (14.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spaniards are Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Ugandan (14.0%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Uruguay (14.0%, a difference of 0.84%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |