Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from Belarus Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 282,283,725 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,520,754 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 2.5%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Nicaraguan	Immigrants from Belarus
Minimum	0.55%	2.7%
Maximum	51.1%	69.5%
Range	50.6%	66.9%
Mean	16.2%	19.4%
Median	17.1%	17.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.9%	14.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.9%	21.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.1%	7.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.3%	11.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.3%	11.6%

Demographics Similar to Nicaraguans and Immigrants from Belarus by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Macedonian (18.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Spanish American Indian (18.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (18.2%, a difference of 0.38%), Asian (18.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Sri Lankan (18.2%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Greek (18.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Brazil (18.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Egyptian (18.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (18.4%, a difference of 0.78%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Macedonians	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 18.1%
Nicaraguans	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 18.1%
Spanish American Indians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 18.2%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 18.2%
Sri Lankans	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 18.2%
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 18.2%
Samoans	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 18.2%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 18.2%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.9 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 18.3%
Italians	99.9 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 18.3%
Immigrants \| Egypt	99.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 18.4%
Albanians	99.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 18.4%
Argentineans	99.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 18.4%
Immigrants \| Italy	99.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 18.4%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	99.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 18.4%
Egyptians	99.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 18.5%
Immigrants \| Brazil	99.8 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 18.5%
Immigrants \| Albania	99.8 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 18.5%
Greeks	99.8 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 18.5%
Immigrants \| Belarus	99.8 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 18.5%