Navajo vs Italian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Navajo
Italian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Navajo
Italians
30.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Italian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,444,505 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 30.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 553,398,049 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.511 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 113.3%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Navajo | Italian |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 96.3% | 98.9% |
| Mean | 40.5% | 16.8% |
| Median | 38.7% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.0% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.2% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.1% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.4% | 21.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.3% | 20.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Navajo by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Pima (29.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 5.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |
Demographics Similar to Italians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Immigrants from Greece (14.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Czech (14.1%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Moldova (14.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and Laotian (14.3%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Poles | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |