Iranian vs Italian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Iranian
Italian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Iranians
Italians
12.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Italian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 312,150,992 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 553,398,049 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.511 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 14.1%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iranian | Italian |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 18.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 16.8% | 98.9% |
Mean | 8.5% | 16.8% |
Median | 8.2% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 21.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 20.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Iranians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Iran (12.5%, a difference of 0.81%), Bhutanese (12.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Italians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Immigrants from Greece (14.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Czech (14.1%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Moldova (14.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and Laotian (14.3%, a difference of 0.82%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |