Marshallese vs Malaysian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
Malaysian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Malaysians
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Malaysian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,760,991 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.288 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,983,571 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 0.96%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Marshallese | Malaysian |
Minimum | 6.9% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 21.1% | 38.2% |
Range | 14.2% | 36.7% |
Mean | 14.6% | 15.2% |
Median | 14.4% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 18.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Marshallese and Malaysians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.72%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |