Marshallese vs Bhutanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
Bhutanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Bhutanese
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Bhutanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,760,991 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.288 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,052,143 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 27.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 6.9% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 21.1% | 66.7% |
| Range | 14.2% | 64.2% |
| Mean | 14.6% | 11.1% |
| Median | 14.4% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |