Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Malaysian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Malaysian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Malaysians
14.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
9.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Malaysian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,843,710 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,983,571 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 0.49%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 0.38% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 56.1% | 38.2% |
| Range | 55.7% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 17.0% | 15.2% |
| Median | 13.9% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Malaysians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa are Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Uruguay (14.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |