Malaysian vs Sierra Leonean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Malaysian
Sierra Leonean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Malaysians
Sierra Leoneans
14.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
33.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Sierra Leonean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,983,571 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,350,076 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 4.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Malaysian | Sierra Leonean |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 38.2% | 40.4% |
| Range | 36.7% | 38.9% |
| Mean | 15.2% | 12.1% |
| Median | 14.8% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Sierra Leoneans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Uruguay (14.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and Ugandan (14.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Immigrants from Kuwait (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Iraqi (13.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Delaware (13.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from South America (13.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Sierra Leoneans | 33.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 32.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 13.7% |
| Iraqis | 31.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.7% |
| Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
| South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
| Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |