Luxembourger vs Fijian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Fijian
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Comparison
Luxembourgers
Fijians
10.8%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
83.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Fijian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,842,959 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.357 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,762,719 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.607 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 9.1%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Fijian |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 16.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 14.5% | 98.8% |
Mean | 9.4% | 16.2% |
Median | 9.9% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 13.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 21.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 20.5% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Scotch-Irish (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Latvian (10.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Finnish (10.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Italian (10.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Puget Sound Salish (10.8%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
Irish | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Swiss | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Marshallese | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
British | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Latvians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Finns | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.4 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Thais | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Austrians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Fijians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Pakistani (11.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Italy (11.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Sudanese (11.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Malaysian (11.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and Pennsylvania German (11.8%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
Icelanders | 85.7 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.5 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 84.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.8% |
Malaysians | 84.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.8% |
Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Italy | 84.0 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.8% |
Fijians | 83.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.8% |
Sudanese | 83.6 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 83.4 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 82.6 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 81.7 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.8% |
Ethiopians | 80.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.8% |
Spanish | 80.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 79.6 /100 | #131 | Good 11.9% |