Iroquois vs South African Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Iroquois
South African
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Iroquois
South Africans
22.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
90.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs South African Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,992,045 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599 and weighted average of 22.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,239,967 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 16.2%, a difference of 35.4%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | South African |
Minimum | 1.6% | 4.4% |
Maximum | 66.3% | 36.2% |
Range | 64.7% | 31.8% |
Mean | 31.3% | 17.2% |
Median | 25.7% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.1% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.9% | 21.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.8% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.1% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Inupiat (22.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Central America (22.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (22.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Chickasaw (21.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and Alaskan Athabascan (21.8%, a difference of 0.83%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 21.7% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 21.7% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 21.7% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 21.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 22.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 22.0% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 22.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 22.0% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 22.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 22.7% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 22.7% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are British (16.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Norway (16.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from England (16.2%, a difference of 0.49%), Finnish (16.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and Serbian (16.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Mongolians | 92.5 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Austrians | 92.0 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Swiss | 92.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 91.8 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.5 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 16.2% |
South Africans | 90.1 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 16.2% |
British | 89.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 16.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #130 | Excellent 16.3% |
Finns | 88.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 16.3% |
Serbians | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 16.3% |
Icelanders | 87.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 16.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 87.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 16.4% |
Brazilians | 87.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 16.4% |