Jordanian vs Albanian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
Albanian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
Albanians
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
MALE POVERTY
90.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Albanian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,386,715 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,144,677 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Albanians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.224 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 1.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Albanian |
Minimum | 2.1% | 0.15% |
Maximum | 30.3% | 17.1% |
Range | 28.2% | 17.0% |
Mean | 10.5% | 8.4% |
Median | 9.2% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 10.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Albanians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Australian (10.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), British (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Indian (Asian) (10.4%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Portuguese (10.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Argentinean (10.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Laotian (10.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |