Jordanian vs Immigrants from Poland Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
Immigrants from Poland
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
Immigrants from Poland
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Immigrants from Poland Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,541,615 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 299,755,807 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 1.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Immigrants from Poland |
Minimum | 1.0% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 34.8% | 29.2% |
Range | 33.7% | 25.6% |
Mean | 17.3% | 15.2% |
Median | 17.8% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Immigrants from Poland by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Moldova (18.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (18.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Asia (18.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |