Japanese vs Spaniard Female Poverty
COMPARE
Japanese
Spaniard
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Japanese
Spaniards
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Spaniard Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,060,032 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 443,063,734 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spaniards and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 13.9%, a difference of 3.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Japanese | Spaniard |
Minimum | 4.1% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 68.3% |
Range | 95.9% | 65.9% |
Mean | 21.0% | 20.4% |
Median | 16.0% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.7% | 22.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.8% | 13.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 12.9% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Spaniards by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spaniards are Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Hmong (13.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Ugandan (14.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (14.0%, a difference of 0.84%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |