Jamaican vs Czechoslovakian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Jamaican
Czechoslovakian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Jamaicans
Czechoslovakians
13.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
7.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Czechoslovakian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 330,158,708 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.005 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,828,483 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 1.3%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jamaican | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 2.1% | 8.6% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 80.0% |
Range | 47.9% | 71.4% |
Mean | 14.4% | 29.8% |
Median | 12.7% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 18.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 42.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 23.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 18.4% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans and Czechoslovakians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Haitian (13.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Denmark (13.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Lebanese (13.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Somali (13.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from the Azores (13.2%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Luxembourger (13.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and Belizean (13.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 10.0 /100 | #222 | Poor 13.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 9.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.2% |
Somalis | 9.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 8.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 7.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.2% |
Haitians | 7.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.2% |
Lebanese | 6.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.2% |
Europeans | 6.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.3% |
Ghanaians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.3% |
Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |