Osage vs Thai Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Osage
Thai
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Osage
Thais
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Thai Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,492,643 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,276,547 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.305 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 56.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Thai |
| Minimum | 6.7% | 0.97% |
| Maximum | 67.2% | 38.0% |
| Range | 60.5% | 37.1% |
| Mean | 21.1% | 8.0% |
| Median | 19.5% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.8% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 5.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Osage by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Thais by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Tsimshian (11.5%, a difference of 3.0%), Filipino (11.4%, a difference of 3.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 4.3%), Chinese (12.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (11.3%, a difference of 4.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |