Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Japan Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Immigrants from Japan
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Immigrants from Japan
11.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Japan Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,562,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,055,385 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.472 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.35%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Immigrants from Japan |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 4.9% |
| Maximum | 20.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 19.1% | 95.1% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 19.4% |
| Median | 10.3% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 25.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 24.6% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Immigrants from Japan by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Maltese (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Maltese (11.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from China (11.4%, a difference of 0.71%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.77%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.4% |