Indian (Asian) vs Maltese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Maltese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Maltese
11.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Maltese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,562,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,992,298 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.020%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Maltese |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 20.6% | 47.8% |
| Range | 19.1% | 44.8% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 16.8% |
| Median | 10.3% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 20.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Maltese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Japan (11.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Japan (11.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.4% |