Indian (Asian) vs Bolivian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Bolivian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Bolivians
11.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Bolivian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,562,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,550,226 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.20%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Bolivian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 20.6% | 42.1% |
| Range | 19.1% | 41.0% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 11.9% |
| Median | 10.3% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Bolivians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Maltese (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (11.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Maltese (11.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Japan (11.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.4% |