Immigrants from Pakistan vs Immigrants from Japan Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Pakistan
Immigrants from Japan
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Pakistan
Immigrants from Japan
11.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Pakistan vs Immigrants from Japan Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,771,473 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,055,385 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.472 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.76%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Pakistan | Immigrants from Japan |
Minimum | 1.8% | 4.9% |
Maximum | 42.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 40.5% | 95.1% |
Mean | 12.1% | 19.4% |
Median | 10.9% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.8% | 13.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 25.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 24.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Pakistan and Immigrants from Japan by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Indian (Asian) (11.3%, a difference of 0.41%), Maltese (11.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Maltese (11.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Indian (Asian) (11.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from China (11.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and Immigrants from Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.77%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.4% |