Immigrants from Thailand vs Japanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Japanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Japanese
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Japanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,905,343 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,060,032 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 0.22%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Japanese |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 4.1% |
| Maximum | 44.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 42.3% | 95.9% |
| Mean | 17.6% | 21.0% |
| Median | 16.4% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 16.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Japanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |