Immigrants from South Africa vs Indian (Asian) Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Indian (Asian)
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Indians (Asian)
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Indian (Asian) Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,179,579 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.815 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,421,628 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 0.44%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 75.0% | 19.1% |
| Range | 73.9% | 17.7% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 9.6% |
| Median | 8.1% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.2% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Indians (Asian) by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Egypt (10.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Jordanian (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Australian (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Denmark (10.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Cambodian (10.4%, a difference of 0.030%), British (10.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Northern European (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |