Immigrants from Nepal vs Mongolian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
Mongolian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Mongolians
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Mongolian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,522,018 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,209,736 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 0.91%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Mongolian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.58% |
| Maximum | 25.5% | 23.4% |
| Range | 24.2% | 22.8% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 8.0% |
| Median | 8.0% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal and Mongolians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Armenian (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |