Immigrants from Latvia vs Egyptian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Egyptian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Egyptians
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
MALE POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Egyptian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,727,577 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,705,416 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 1.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Egyptian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 40.7% | 34.6% |
| Range | 39.2% | 33.4% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 9.6% |
| Median | 8.3% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and Egyptians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Indonesia (10.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Finnish (10.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Egypt (10.4%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Belgian (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Czechoslovakian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from England (10.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |