Immigrants from Latin America vs Danish Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,992,515 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.484 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,175,861 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 0.43%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Latin America	Danish
Minimum	6.0%	9.6%
Maximum	37.6%	100.0%
Range	31.6%	90.4%
Mean	17.8%	33.8%
Median	18.7%	22.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	16.1%	17.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	20.9%	37.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.8%	20.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.1%	26.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.1%	25.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Danes by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from Oceania (19.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Syrian (19.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (19.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Austria (19.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and Yugoslavian (19.8%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Lebanon (19.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belgium (19.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Hungarian (19.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (19.8%, a difference of 0.080%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Panamanians	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 19.7%
Slavs	84.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	84.1 /100 \| #144	Excellent 19.7%
Canadians	83.8 /100 \| #145	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	83.6 /100 \| #146	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Austria	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Latin America	81.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Oceania	81.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 19.7%
Syrians	80.2 /100 \| #150	Excellent 19.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	79.7 /100 \| #151	Good 19.8%
Yugoslavians	79.0 /100 \| #152	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Japan	78.1 /100 \| #153	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 19.8%
Hungarians	76.6 /100 \| #155	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Belgium	76.4 /100 \| #156	Good 19.8%
Danes	75.5 /100 \| #157	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	75.3 /100 \| #158	Good 19.8%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	74.4 /100 \| #159	Good 19.8%
Pakistanis	74.1 /100 \| #160	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Belize	74.1 /100 \| #161	Good 19.8%
French Canadians	73.0 /100 \| #162	Good 19.9%