Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Moldova Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Immigrants from Moldova
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Immigrants from Moldova
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Moldova Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,963,649 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.855 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,368,843 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.146 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 0.64%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Immigrants from Moldova |
Minimum | 2.9% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 27.5% |
Range | 97.1% | 24.7% |
Mean | 21.6% | 11.4% |
Median | 10.3% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.4% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Moldova by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Macedonian (11.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |