Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from France
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from France
Immigrants from Northern Africa
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
83.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
68.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,810,064 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.479 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,053,699 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from France | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Minimum | 1.7% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 44.6% | 55.9% |
Range | 43.0% | 52.9% |
Mean | 13.3% | 16.3% |
Median | 11.1% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Northern Africa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |