Immigrants from Congo vs Choctaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Choctaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Choctaw
17.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Congo vs Choctaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,087,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023 and weighted average of 17.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,592,766 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.540 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 3.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Congo | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 41.7% | 68.1% |
| Range | 40.8% | 58.1% |
| Mean | 18.6% | 23.7% |
| Median | 17.3% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.6% | 25.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo and Choctaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (17.3%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |