Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Bangladeshi Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,521,448 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.235 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,222,354 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285 and weighted average of 22.5%, a difference of 3.1%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bangladesh	Bangladeshi
Minimum	5.6%	2.2%
Maximum	49.6%	47.8%
Range	44.0%	45.6%
Mean	20.3%	21.1%
Median	19.0%	20.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.6%	16.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	23.1%	25.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.5%	8.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.6%	8.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.6%	8.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh and Bangladeshis by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Bahamian (21.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (21.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Switzerland (21.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Yaqui (21.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and New Zealander (21.7%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Alaskan Athabascan (22.5%, a difference of 0.050%), U.S. Virgin Islander (22.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Senegal (22.4%, a difference of 0.27%), French American Indian (22.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and Dominican (22.3%, a difference of 0.93%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
New Zealanders	0.2 /100 \| #273	Tragic 21.7%
Immigrants \| Honduras	0.1 /100 \| #274	Tragic 21.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #275	Tragic 21.8%
Bahamians	0.1 /100 \| #276	Tragic 21.8%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	0.1 /100 \| #277	Tragic 21.8%
Yaqui	0.1 /100 \| #278	Tragic 21.9%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #279	Tragic 21.9%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.1 /100 \| #280	Tragic 21.9%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.1 /100 \| #281	Tragic 21.9%
Bermudans	0.1 /100 \| #282	Tragic 21.9%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #283	Tragic 22.0%
Tlingit-Haida	0.0 /100 \| #284	Tragic 22.0%
Ottawa	0.0 /100 \| #285	Tragic 22.0%
Ugandans	0.0 /100 \| #286	Tragic 22.1%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.0 /100 \| #287	Tragic 22.1%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #288	Tragic 22.3%
French American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #289	Tragic 22.3%
Immigrants \| Senegal	0.0 /100 \| #290	Tragic 22.4%
Bangladeshis	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic 22.5%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.0 /100 \| #292	Tragic 22.5%
U.S. Virgin Islanders	0.0 /100 \| #293	Tragic 22.5%