Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Asia
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Asia
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,172,468 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,448,057 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 2.3%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Minimum | 2.9% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 34.9% |
Range | 63.7% | 32.8% |
Mean | 12.5% | 10.7% |
Median | 10.9% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 12.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |